For instance, like I stated above, DCS uses the same engine as DVD95Copy.
Every program has it's own way of re-encoding the video. The main determining factor in size and quality is the transcoding engine that is used by the program. DVDShrink (and similair programs) all re-encode the video material to make it fit on a single DVD. MikeTR wrote:It's a little more complicated than that. Hope this complicates things even more than they were already. It just depends on your view if it is wotrh the extra hassle. It takes a lot more work (and a fast PC) but it is worth it is you are a quality freak.Ĭompare it to encoding an MP3 using the LAME encoder or by using a program like MP3CDDoctor. As a result, you'll have the highest possible quality while compressing the data enough to fit on one DVD. The 'Big three'guide I mentioned uses the CCE or TMPGEnc encoding engine to re-encode or transcode (never really figured out what the difference between the two terms really is) the video material.
#Tmpgenc authoring works 6 create looping dvd full#
While not as full fledged as the SP version, it is in the same price class as TMPGEnc. TMPGEnc was created as a cheaper alternative ($50-70) and as a result CCE Basic was released.
CCE is the encoding engine used by profesionals (and very expensive for the original SP version at $2000). However, the two best MPEG encoders (which is the basis of DVD compatible video) are TMPGEnc Plus and Cinema Craft Encoder (CCE). DVDShrink has it's own transcoding engine, which is very good in compressing data while still retaining video quality.
It's a little more complicated than that. Have you used dvd shrink? if it doesn't fit on a dvd, the quality will be lower regardless, because of compression Hoxlund wrote:quality? how can it be better than dvdshrink?
0 kommentar(er)
